On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:15:28PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > I haven't run performance numbers on this series specifically, but I did > run performance numbers on the slightly more invasive patches which come > after (through step 1 above) > > x11perf -aa10text > before: 1925000/s > after: 1941667/s (clearly not a good test) So looking at cairo on a SNB i5-2500 (desktop gt1) with only this prep series also suggests no discernible impact. The remaining test will be to exercise a compositor and multiple contexts. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
