On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:09:27AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ville noticed this while doing another review; we may as well cancel
> this work just to make sure we don't try anything fancy after disabling
> the RPS interfaces.
>
> Reported-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 93b01e1..72ad817 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3657,6 +3657,7 @@ void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_device *dev)
> ironlake_disable_rc6(dev);
> } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->rps.delayed_resume_work);
> + cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->rps.work);
Module unload is a bit a mess around this area here: We disable irqs too
late, so the work item could easily rearm between the canceling here nad
the disable_rps below. I'll throw a patch on top to remedy that.
-Daniel
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->rps.vlv_work);
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
