On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:43:39PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > I think this is a nice generalization on it's own, but it's primarily > prep work for my PPGTT support. Does this bother anyone? > > The only down side I can see is we waste 2k of cpu unmappable space > (unless we have something else that is <= 2k and doesn't need to be page > aligned). > > It's RFC because I have only hacked this up and haven't thoroughly > tested a bunch of error and suspend/resume paths. Ugh. Fragmentation, you need a top down allocator. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
