On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:06:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:45:37PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > > gem_tiling_max_stride writes a data pattern to an X-tiled buffer using > > the maximum supported stride, reads the data back as linear, and > > verifies that the data didn't get scrambled on the way. > > > > The test also checks that some invalid stride values are rejected > > properly. > > > > v2: Check invalid strides > > v3: Check invalid stride with Y-tiling > > Include a few more invalid stride values > > Fix gen3 X-tile size > > v4: A few more invalid strides :) > > Drop the useless memset() > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > I think I've exhausted my wishlist, and congrats on finding the bug, so > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> Merged all three patches, thanks a lot for supplying paranoid igt cases. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
