On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:49:43AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:34:01PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently we try to detect a symmetric memory configurations > > using a magic DCC2_MODIFIED_ENHANCED_DISABLE bit. That bit is > > either only set on a very specific subset of machines or it > > just does not exist (it's not mentioned in any public chipset > > datasheets I've found). As it happens my CL/CTG machines never > > set said bit, even if I populate the channels with identical > > sticks. > > > > So let's do the L-shaped memory detection the same way as the > > desktop variants, ie. just look at the DRAM rank boundary > > registers to see if both channels have an identical size. > > > > With this my CL/CTG no longer claim L-shaped memory when I use > > identical sticks. Also tested with non-matching sticks just to > > make sure the L-shaped memory is still properly detected. > > > > And for completeness let's update the debugfs code to dump > > the correct set of registers on each platform. > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Did you check this with the swapping igt? I have some vague memories of > bug reports where somehow the machine was acting like it's L-shaped memory > despite that banks were populated equally. I've iirc tried all kinds of > tricks to figure it out, all to absolutely no avail. BTW looking at the patches/dumps in eg. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28813 I can't immediately see a single thing that is actually using the correct register offsets for cl/ctg. So I'm a bit sceptical about how well this was researched in the past. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
