On 04/03/2013 03:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury > <joseph.salisbury at canonical.com > <mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com>> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel > bisect, it was found the following was the first bad commit: > > > commit c2fb7916927e989ea424e61ce5fe617e54878827 > Merge: 29de6ce 6f0c058 > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch > <mailto:daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>> > Date: Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200 > > Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued > > > > The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1. However, further > testing also shows this bug is now fixed in v3.9-rc4. > > I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted see if I > can get your feedback. Do you happen to have an idea what may > have fixed this in v3.9-rc4, so we can send a request to stable, > if not already done? Otherwise, I can perform a reverse bisect to > see which commit fixed this. > > > So apparently it's an oops somewhere in the nouveau setup code, which > bisected to a backmerge which has _only_ conflicts in drm/i915 driver > code. > > I have no idea what blew up here, sorry. > -Daniel Thanks for the info, Daniel. I'll go the reverse bisect route. > > > > > Thanks, > > Joe > > [0] http://pad.lv/1109309 > > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
