On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > So I've checked hsw bspec and the problem is that hw guys again > > changed the bits around a bit, and I think on HSW we actually want > > (0x8 << 3) instead of what's currently there. > > Meh, I've screwed up reading the tables, 0x3 << 3 is what we imo want, > so nothing needs to be changed. Sorry for the confusion. > -Daniel I think the existing code is magic that we don't/shouldn't need. But I also see no reason to change it. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
