[PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: WA for zero memory channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>

Commit c457d9cf256e ("drm/i915: Make sure we have enough memory
bandwidth on ICL") assumes that we always have a non-zero
dram_info->channels and uses it as a divisor. We need num memory
channels to be at least 1 for sane bw limits checking, even when PCode
returns 0, so lets force it to 1 in this case.

Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index 584ab5ce4106..c5f70f3e930e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel
 			    "Failed to get memory subsystem information, ignoring bandwidth limits");
 		return ret;
 	}
+	num_channels = max_t(u8, 1, num_channels);
 
 	deinterleave = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_channels, is_y_tile ? 4 : 2);
 	dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi);
-- 
2.26.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux