On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:01:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We've mostly switched over to the new more flexible schema, but
> there's one check left in the modeset code.
>
> Motivated by a question from Ville whether there's really no way an
> unsupported pixel_format can escape into our platform update_plane
> callbacks.
>
> v2: Ville noticed that the fb->depth check is redudant when we already
> check fb->pixel_format.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 84bd8d3..3f3a3dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -7954,10 +7954,8 @@ intel_set_config_compute_mode_changes(struct drm_mode_set *set,
> config->mode_changed = true;
> } else if (set->fb == NULL) {
> config->mode_changed = true;
> - } else if (set->fb->depth != set->crtc->fb->depth) {
> - config->mode_changed = true;
> - } else if (set->fb->bits_per_pixel !=
> - set->crtc->fb->bits_per_pixel) {
> + } else if (set->fb->pixel_format !=
> + set->crtc->fb->pixel_format) {
> config->mode_changed = true;
> } else
> config->fb_changed = true;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
--
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC
