On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote: >> Apparently massive overclocking like that makes your system die >> prematurely in a crash. So 3.10 it is, imo. >> -Daniel > > It's like all overclocking I guess, we simply give the user an > opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot. Glad to hear it is actually > doing something though. > > I agree that 3.10 sounds right; I'm thinking we'll want a module > parameter or something as well, to prevent spurious bug reports. What do > you think? I think not having a module option is ok, I don't expect that the enthusiast boards required to adjust the limits are that common. So it shouldn't affect more than just a few users, and those it does affect should know what their doing. Module options after all don't prevent them from setting unstable rc6 options, either ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
