On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:55:54PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Vinicius Tinti (2021-01-29 18:15:19) > > By enabling -Wunreachable-code-aggressive on Clang the following code > > paths are unreachable. > > That code exists as commentary and, especially for sdvo, library > functions that we may need in future. I would argue that this code could be removed since it is in git history. It can be restored when needed. This will make the code cleaner. > The ivb-gt1 case => as we now set the gt level for ivb, should we not > enable the optimisation for ivb unaffected by the w/a? Just no one has > taken the time to see if it causes a regression. I don't know. I just found out that the code is unreachable. > For error state, the question remains whether we should revert to > uncompressed data if the compressed stream is larger than the original. I don't know too. In this last two cases the code could be commented and the decisions and problems explained in the comment section. > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
