On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:30:05AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/3/22 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>: > > This reverts commit cc464b2a17c59adedbdc02cc54341d630354edc3. > > > > The reason is that Takashi Iwai reported a regression bisected to this > > commit: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org/msg18788.html > > > > His machine has eDP on port D (usual desktop all-in-on setup), which > > intel_dp.c identifies as an eDP panel, but the hsw ddi code > > mishandles. > > > > But in retrospective I also don't like that this leaks highly platform > > specific details into common code, and the reason is that the drm > > vblank layer sucks. So instead I think we should: > > - move the cpu_transcoder into the dynamic pipe_config tracking (once > > that's merged). > > - fix up the drm vblank layer to finally deal with kms crtc objects > > instead of int pipes. > > Looks like we'll never get rid of all the unclaimed register errors... > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
