On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:14:56AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:03:18 -0300 > Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> > > > > We're starting to add many IS_HASWELL checks for the power well code, > > so add a HAS_POWER_WELL macro to properly document that we're checking > > for hardware that has the power down well. > > > > To be more future proof, we'll need to differentiate multiple power > wells. Not sure we have good names for them though... I think we'll just invent names once they show up ... Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. I've had to drop the first hunk though since that has been introduced by the previous patch, which I've rejected. -Daniel > > -- > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
