On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 12:06 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2020-12-04 11:51:38) > > We may still be interested in results of a test even if it has tainted > > the kernel. On the other hand, we need to kill the test on taint if no > > other means of killing it on a jam is active. > > Just so long as we are confident that the original error is preserved, > and not lost under a deluge of what may come next. E.g. is there > sufficient syncs after detecting the taint to record the kernel logs > asap? > > Although that the kernel taints is a strong indicator the test results > are unreliable (or even irrelevant), imo. Unless tainted with kernel warnings which result from bugs that can be fixed, I believe. Thanks, Janusz > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
