On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:39:09PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:28:52PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The other thing was that I didn't manage to get things to work properly, > > leaving some random cachline dirt on the screen. Looking at your code, you > > add the gfdt flush to every ring_flush, whereas I've tried to be clever > > and only flushed after batches rendering to the frontbuffer. So probably a > > bug in my code, or a flush on a given ring doesn't flush out caches for > > one of the other engines. > > Right, we have a formalized interface for flushes to scanout rather than > always flushing GFDT. We do? Where's that? -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel OTC
