[PATCH] sna: Fix comment on GCC version check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:27:52PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> The comment was introduced with...
>> >>
>> >> commit 528dbf9ebb2688f476ef283be59d0f2232159dcb
>> >> "sna: Fix build on older GCC for cpuid()"
>> >>
>> >> ...and is a bit misleading.
>> >
>> > The comment was a reminder to me as to whether I needed to check
>> > __gnuc_minor__ for 4.4; not duplicating what was already expressed in
>> > the code.
>>
>>
>> #if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4) /* 4.4 */
>>
>> I wanted to know what the above line means?
>> Check for gcc-4.4 or check for gcc-v4-compatibility?
>
> Finally, found the information I was looking for - took ages to checkout
> gcc.git. cpuid.h was first introduced in gcc-4.4
>
> And I'll recant and fixup __cpuid to use __get_cpuid() instead.

Thanks for taking a look into gcc sources.

Be glad the GNU folk uses Git besides CVS... The subject-line and
changelog from binutils/gcc/etc, is still strange to me.
Cloning is slow, unfortunately. I keep tarballs of all my cloned local
GIT repositories.

- Sedat -

> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux