On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:20:26PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:35:51PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> With xf86-video-intel-git13461a1 [1] I see this: > >> > >> [ build-log ] > >> ... > >> CC sna_cpu.lo > >> 8 warnings generated. > >> CC sna_damage.lo > >> CC sna_display.lo > >> sna_cpu.c:47:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__cpuid' is > >> invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > >> __cpuid(1, eax, ebx, ecx, edx); > >> ^ > > [snip] > > > >> So, clang should be treated differently? > > > > It doesn't use cpuid.h unless the compiler claims to be gcc >= 4. It > > would appear once again that clang is broken. > > Can you explain why clang is BROKEN in your eyes? Because it claims to be gcc 4, yet fails to provide a function/macro provided by gcc 4. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
