Hey, Op 22-09-2020 om 13:51 schreef Wang, Zhi A: > > Hi, > > Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against drm-intel-gt-next branch. > > Thanks > > -- > > The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701: > > drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request. (2020-09-21 11:09:46 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020 > > for you to fetch changes up to e1b49ae155451aaa039eeb23fce808c71a038283: > > drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler. (2020-09-22 12:09:56 +0300) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020: > > - Introduce ww lock support into GVT-g. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Zhi Wang (1): > drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler. > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) I've taken a look at this branch, and I have some feedback. Adding ww_ctx blindly like is done doesn't work. For example I'm working on a patch that adds ww handling to i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), so you don't have to perform manually in prepare_shadow_wa_ctx(). intel_context_pin() already has a ww dance, you can keep calling it without open coding it. If you do decide to call it manually, intel_context_put would have to be called after ctx_fini. Cheers, Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
