On 9/25/2020 3:33 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 25/09/2020 13:18, Maor Gottlieb wrote:
On 9/25/2020 2:55 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:13:30AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/scatterlist/main.c
b/tools/testing/scatterlist/main.c
index 0a1464181226..4899359a31ac 100644
+++ b/tools/testing/scatterlist/main.c
@@ -55,14 +55,13 @@ int main(void)
for (i = 0, test = tests; test->expected_segments; test++,
i++) {
struct page *pages[MAX_PAGES];
struct sg_table st;
- int ret;
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
set_pages(pages, test->pfn, test->num_pages);
- ret = __sg_alloc_table_from_pages(&st, pages,
test->num_pages,
- 0, test->size, test->max_seg,
- GFP_KERNEL);
- assert(ret == test->alloc_ret);
+ sg = __sg_alloc_table_from_pages(&st, pages,
test->num_pages, 0,
+ test->size, test->max_seg, NULL, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ assert(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sg) == test->alloc_ret);
Some test coverage for relatively complex code would be very
welcomed. Since
the testing framework is already there, even if it bit-rotted a
bit, but
shouldn't be hard to fix.
A few tests to check append/grow works as expected, in terms of
how the end
table looks like given the initial state and some different page
patterns
added to it. And both crossing and not crossing into sg chaining
scenarios.
This function is basic for all RDMA devices and we are pretty
confident
that the old and new flows are tested thoroughly.
Well, since 0-day is reporting that __i915_gem_userptr_alloc_pages is
crashing on this, it probably does need some tests :\
Jason
It is crashing in the regular old flow which already tested.
However, I will add more tests.
Do you want to take some of the commits from
git://people.freedesktop.org/~tursulin/drm-intel sgtest? It would be
fine by me. I can clean up the commit messages if you want.
I will very appreciate it. Thanks
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tursulin/drm-intel/commit/?h=sgtest&id=79102f4d795c4769431fc44a6cf7ed5c5b1b5214
- this one undoes the bit rot and makes the test just work on the
current kernel.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tursulin/drm-intel/commit/?h=sgtest&id=b09bfe80486c4d93ee1d8ae17d5b46397b1c6ee1
- this one you probably should squash in your patch. Minus the zeroing
of struct sg_stable since that would hide the issue.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tursulin/drm-intel/commit/?h=sgtest&id=97f5df37e612f798ced90541eece13e2ef639181
- final commit is optional but I guess handy for debugging.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
