On 15/09/2020 02:47, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
On 9/14/20 4:04 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 12/09/2020 04:21, Lu Baolu wrote:
Tom Murphy has almost done all the work. His latest patch series was
posted here.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200903201839.7327-1-murphyt7@xxxxxx/
Thanks a lot!
This series is a follow-up with below changes:
1. Add a quirk for the i915 driver issue described in Tom's cover
letter.
Last week I have copied you on an i915 series which appears to remove
the need for this quirk. so if we get those i915 patches reviewed and
merged, do you still want to pursue this quirk?
It's up to the graphic guys. I don't know the details in i915 driver.
I don't think my tests could cover all cases.
I am the graphic guy. :) I just need some reviews (internally) for my
series and then we can merge it, at which point you don't need the quirk
patch any more. I'll try to accelerate this.
With regards to testing, you could send your series with my patches on
top to our trybot mailing list (intel-gfx-trybot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/intel-gfx-trybot/series/?ordering=-last_updated)
which would show you if it is still hitting the DMAR issues in i915.
2. Fix several bugs in patch "iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use
bounce buffers" to make the bounce buffer work for untrusted devices.
3. Several cleanups in iommu/vt-d driver after the conversion.
With the previous version of the series I hit a problem on Ivybridge
where apparently the dma engine width is not respected. At least that
is my layman interpretation of the errors. From the older thread:
<3> [209.526605] DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not
sufficient for the mapped address (ffff008000)
Relevant iommu boot related messages are:
<6>[ 0.184234] DMAR: Host address width 36
<6>[ 0.184245] DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x0
<6>[ 0.184288] DMAR: dmar0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap
c0000020e60262 ecap f0101a
<6>[ 0.184308] DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed91000 flags: 0x1
<6>[ 0.184337] DMAR: dmar1: reg_base_addr fed91000 ver 1:0 cap
c9008020660262 ecap f0105a
<6>[ 0.184357] DMAR: RMRR base: 0x000000d8d28000 end: 0x000000d8d46fff
<6>[ 0.184377] DMAR: RMRR base: 0x000000db000000 end: 0x000000df1fffff
<6>[ 0.184398] DMAR-IR: IOAPIC id 2 under DRHD base 0xfed91000
IOMMU 1
<6>[ 0.184414] DMAR-IR: HPET id 0 under DRHD base 0xfed91000
<6>[ 0.184428] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to
support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
<6>[ 0.185173] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
<6>[ 0.878934] DMAR: No ATSR found
<6>[ 0.878966] DMAR: dmar0: Using Queued invalidation
<6>[ 0.879007] DMAR: dmar1: Using Queued invalidation
<6>[ 0.915032] DMAR: Intel(R) Virtualization Technology for
Directed I/O
<6>[ 0.915060] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO
(SWIOTLB)
<6>[ 0.915084] software IO TLB: mapped [mem 0xc80d4000-0xcc0d4000]
(64MB)
(Full boot log at
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_7054/fi-ivb-3770/boot0.txt,
failures at
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_7054/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live@xxxxxxxx.)
Does this look familiar or at least plausible to you? Is this
something your new series has fixed?
This happens during attaching a domain to device. It has nothing to do
with this patch series. I will look into this issue, but not in this
email thread context.
I am not sure what step is attaching domain to device, but these type
messages:
<3> [209.526605] DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not
>> sufficient for the mapped address (ffff008000)
They definitely appear to happen at runtime, as i915 is getting
exercised by userspace.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
