On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Hi Steven, >> > >> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2 >> > weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking >> > everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also >> > means we'll miss out a bit in the integration testing -next provides, >> > which did hurt a bit in recent efforts. Hence can you please include >> > >> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel drm-intel-next-queued >> > >> > into linux-next? Probably best to merge it after drm-next. Note that >> > drm-intel-next are the QA'ed chunks I send off to Dave. Also, any >> > mailing lists I'm supposed to follow? And if possible please cc >> > intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org besides dri-devel/lkml when conflicts >> > with that tree pop up (you won't get moderation spam any more, we've >> > fixed that up). >> >> I think you want to send this here to Stephen Rothwell. CCed. >> > > This is why I tell people to call me Steve or Steven, but never Stephen, > otherwise people might confuse me with one of the Stephens that also do > kernel development. > > Note, this is not the first time I've been confused with someone else. > So don't feel bad ;-) Oops, indeed picked the wrong mail from my sea of "drm/i915 broke stuff, again" mails ;-) Sorry for the noise, Steve. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
