On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:32:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all > > So this is my old attempt to push our modeset infrastructure a bit further, > rebased on top of latest dinq. Originally I wanted to push this a bit further > still before submitting for rfc, but with fastboot picking up I think it's > better to throw it out there now. [snip] > Comments, flames and ideas for the patches themselves, but also for the above > issues in general highly welcome. It's a good idea, as tracking the pipe config rather than attempting to reconstruct and compare a mode is far more likely not to fail during fastboot for the initial takeover. However, we will still need mode reconstruction for the user facing aspects - but we may just get away with a few white lies as the modeset itself will still be detected as a no-op when comparing the pipe configs. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
