On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 01:55:44 PM Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0100 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > > On Monday, February 04, 2013 01:37:20 PM Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without > > > > userspace help. Such drivers can can call a new funciton, > > > > pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature. In that > > > > case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend > > > > time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things > > > > alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence. > > > > > > > > v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan) > > > > v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > > > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com> > > > > > > for all [1-3/3]. > > > > Any chance for an r-b on the PM one at least? Then Daniel could > > probably push this through drm-intel-next. > > Done. Thanks, I've merged the first two patches to drm-intel-next, the i915 one still needs a bit of care imo. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
