On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:32:16PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > It should only be used with caution... > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> Isn't that like the general assumption of these module parameters that they can have pretty massive bad side-effects? Meaning I'm routinely checking these already anyway in bug reports, same for non-standard rc6 settings. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > index 9cc8f87..912db3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int i915_enable_fbc __read_mostly = -1; > module_param_named(i915_enable_fbc, i915_enable_fbc, int, 0600); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(i915_enable_fbc, > "Enable frame buffer compression for power savings " > + "WARNING: FBC has been implicated in hangs over the years, and should likely be left to the default value. " > "(default: -1 (use per-chip default))"); > > unsigned int i915_lvds_downclock __read_mostly = 0; > -- > 1.8.1.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
