On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:11:38PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > We make no attempt to fixup the source as we adjust the destination > > rectangle, expect the caller to have already fixed that up. This makes > > no sense, asking userspace to compensate for the kernel adjusting the > > one rectangle not the other, so simply reject any attempt to show an > > partially visible box. Userspace should know better. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> > > I guess this makes sense for now, given that the only user we have (ddx) > needs to copy things around anyway ... Still, some common users and > testcases across drivers would be nice for this </wishful-thinking>. > > Applied to fixes. Dropped again, since Ville has a more complete solution to this in his queue. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
