From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
unfortunately rc6 is still a mysterious system and not all tests
provide the expected results.
I split the three tests in three different patches in order to
have more flexibility in picking them.
Thanks Chris and Mika for the reviews,
Andi
Changelog:
* v5 -> v6:
- the tests are split in three different patches, nothing
else.
* v4 -> v5:
- added changes in v4 which I forgot to include
- a small renaming and refactoring suggested by Mika to
make clear the purpose of the test function. Now it's
called "is_rc6_active" in a question format (and I
believe Chris won't like my creativity) and it returns
true if rc6 is active and false otherwise. Thanks, Mika!
- fixed a couple of typos.
- dropped the live_rc6_basic test.
* v3 -> v4:
- just a small refactoring where test_rc6 becomes a
measure function while another test_rc6 checks the
return value from the measure.
* v2 -> v3:
- rebased on top of the latest drm-tip
- fixed exiting order in rc6_basic to avoid exiting
without releasing the pm reference
* v1 -> v2:
- some changes from Chris.
Andi Shyti (3):
drm/i915/selftests: add busy selftests for rc6
drm/i915/selftests: add threshold selftests for rc6
drm/i915/selftests: add basic on/off selftests for rc6
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h | 3 +
3 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
