On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:23:00 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > > If the current field is not zero and doesn't match the VBT, we might > > add a debug statement. It could indicate a BIOS programmed value that > > didn't involve a VBT update (I can imagine some vendors might do > > this). Overwriting the current with the different VBT value may lead > > to breakage or sub-optimal timings. > > We dump the current values (read out from the PP regs), the vbt values > and now also the new values we write back into the regs. That not good > enough? I suppose, it just means more digging if there's a mismatch. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
