On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:15:26 +0300, mika.kuoppala at intel.com wrote: > > From: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin at intel.com> > > > > Subsequent threads returning EBUSY from vm_insert_pfn() was not handled > > correctly. As a result concurrent access from new threads to > > mmapped data caused SIGBUS. > > > > Tested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin at intel.com> > > Fixes? Reported-by? > > I would order the case slightly different so that the comment block > comes after EIO. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> I've added the fixes note and applied both patches to -fixes. Thanks for the patch & review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
