From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
check_digital_port_conflicts() is done needlessly late. Move it earlier.
This will be needed as later on we want to set any_ms=true a bit later
for non-modesets too and we can't call this guy without the
connection_mutex held.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index a8444d9841c1..44bd4d15019b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -13456,11 +13456,6 @@ static int intel_modeset_checks(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
struct intel_crtc *crtc;
int ret, i;
- if (!check_digital_port_conflicts(state)) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("rejecting conflicting digital port configuration\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* keep the current setting */
if (!state->cdclk.force_min_cdclk_changed)
state->cdclk.force_min_cdclk = dev_priv->cdclk.force_min_cdclk;
@@ -13622,6 +13617,12 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
any_ms = true;
}
+ if (any_ms && !check_digital_port_conflicts(state)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("rejecting conflicting digital port configuration\n");
+ ret = EINVAL;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(&state->base);
if (ret)
goto fail;
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
