Re: [PATCH] Make is_signed_type() simpler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:21:48PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 29/09/2019 22.06, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > * Simply compare -1 with 0,
> > * Drop unnecessary parenthesis sets
> > 
> > -#define is_signed_type(type)       (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> > +#define is_signed_type(type)       ((type)-1 < 0)
> 
> NAK. I wrote it that way to avoid -Wtautological-compare when type is
> unsigned.

Was is W=1?

godbolt doesn't show it with just -Wall

	https://godbolt.org/z/kCA7mm

And the warning which found i915 case is -Wextra not -Wtautological-compare.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux