On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:55:22 +0200 Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:39:26 -0800, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > Can you add another patch on top of this to have the starting seqno be a > > near pre-wrap value so we can catch bugs even without igt. > > I tried that but failed. I suspect that there is something in hw/sw > that doesn't like if first seqno is >0x80000000. Something in hw needs > to initialized explicitly if seqno is not starting from 1? > Nothing that I am aware of. If you have the first be 0, and then add a huge jump right after that, does it work? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
