On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:38 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2019-08-16 13:26:44) > > > Please, report the actual problem. Blindly reverting a patch without > > > even an explanation of your regressions is not the way to do it. > > > > As stated, the system doesn't suspend. > > > > If you would like to wait, you will get test results from our CI > > giving the current failed state and the outcome of the patch. > > Platform type, SSD vendor and type, firmware version? Also not a fan of knee-jerk reverts. Even if it may turn out to be necessary, let's at least start with a bug report for an opportunity to fix first! Could you please try Rafael's solution? These two commits here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=xps13-9380-20190812&id=accd2dd72c8f087441d725dd916688171519e4e6 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=xps13-9380-20190812&id=4eaefe8c621c6195c91044396ed8060c179f7aae _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx