On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:31:58 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > Let's be a bit more paranoid here. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 3c71850..a9bc673 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -1224,6 +1224,9 @@ static void assert_pch_dp_disabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > WARN(dp_pipe_enabled(dev_priv, pipe, port_sel, val), > "PCH DP (0x%08x) enabled on transcoder %c, should be disabled\n", > reg, pipe_name(pipe)); > + > + WARN(HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv->dev) && (val & SDVO_PIPE_B_SELECT), > + "IBX PCH dp port still using transcoder B\n"); Only an issue if both pipe B selected and enabled, right? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
