On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > The existing assertions were written under the assumption that we wanted > to test the related PLL to a CRTC. With the split of PLL into a > separately managed entity which may be shared amongst CRTCs, we need to > pass in both the CRTC and the PLL to the assertion routine. > Occassionally, this means passing NULL for the CRTC as we wish to check > the status of the PLL irrespective of the current CRTC. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
