On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:47:13 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:39:37PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:33:54 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > This patch looks more like a random set of registers than interrupt > > > definitions. Also it's missing the sob line. Please clarify a bit what > > > this is about. > > > > Should probably be mashed in with the IRQ patch; do you want to do that > > when you apply? > > On re-reading it looks like they're indeed all irq related - I've been > confused with all this SPRITE stuff in them. So I guess just your sob line > is awol. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
