Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 May 2019, Daniel Vetter wrote:

> In some special cases we must not block, but there's not a
> spinlock, preempt-off, irqs-off or similar critical section already
> that arms the might_sleep() debug checks. Add a non_block_start/end()
> pair to annotate these.

Just putting preempt on/off around these is not sufficient?

If not and you need to add another type of critical section then would
this not need to be added to the preempt counters? See
include/linux/preempt.h? Looks like there are sufficient bits left to put
the counter in there.


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux