On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 14:32, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> wrote: > Like in this patch, the defines indentation in some patches in this > series sounds strange, wrong, or at least different from the one > already in use. > > So, since I don't know if we should care about indentation now, for > those patches I'll just mark like this: > > * indentation > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> > The identation is different between registers themselves (e.g., 0xSOMETHING) and the bits we use in those registers (e.g., (1<<31)). So this is on purpose. -- Eugeni Dodonov <http://eugeni.dodonov.net/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120326/b843f732/attachment.htm>
