On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 08:03:08PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 11:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > ... instead of calling each one for each generation indiviudally.
> >
> > Notice that we've already managed to be inconsistent, the resume path
> > is missing an IS_VLV check. As a nice benefit we can mark all the
> > platform specific enable/disable functions as static and hide them in
> > intel_pm.c
> >
> > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>
> I have very similar patch for this as well (for HSW patches to come
> somewhat later this week), you beat me on sending it by a few days. So:
>
> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com>
>
> Just one (actually, two) bikesheds below.
>
> > +void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev))
> > + ironlake_disable_drps(dev);
> > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
> > + gen6_disable_rps(dev);
> > +}
>
> Just a minor bikeshed on those if loops. Wouldn't it be cleaner to
> transform the 2nd if into 'else if'?
I guess I'll leave that for your hsw patches ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
