On 06/24/2012 03:51 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, only for gen6+, and now with Dave's suggestion implemented to tell drm > core that we don't need agp. It's ugly and I really prefer if we'd kill the drm > agp midlayer stuff instead. But this way we can go forward with moving gen6+ gtt > stuff to drm/i915 and implementing some neat new cool things. > > As usual, flames&bikesheds highly welcome. I cannot think on a less invasive way to do so, so, for the series: Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com> With just one tiny bikeshed on patch2. Eugeni
