On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:27:56AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > While typing these I think doing an s/component_master/aggregate/ > > > would be useful: > > > - it's shorter :-) > > > - I think component/aggregate is much more meaningful naming than > > > component/puppetmaster or something like that. At least to my > > > English ear "aggregate" emphasizes much more the "assemble a pile of > > > things into something bigger" aspect, and there's not really much > > > of a control hierarchy between aggregate and constituing components. > > > > > > But that's way more than a quick doc typing exercise ... > > > > > > Thanks to Ram for commenting on an initial draft of these docs. > > > > > > v2: Review from Rafael: > > > - git add Documenation/driver-api/component.rst > > > - lots of polish to the wording + spelling fixes. > > > > > > v3: Review from Russell: > > > - s/framework/helper > > > - clarify the documentation for component_match_add functions. > > > > > > v4: Remove a few superflous "This". > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: "C, Ramalingam" <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for doing this! > > > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for reviewing (obviously includes Rafael and Russell too)! > > For merging I see two options: > - All through drm-intel, but will only land in 5.2 because the feature > cut-off has already happened for i915. So a bit awkward. > - Topic branch with the 2 component patches plus the snd-hda/drm-i915 > patch, so that you/Takashi/drm can pull it in as needed. The drm > component doc patch (3/4 in this series) I can pull in later on. > > Greg/Takashi, any preferences? Just realized that for the mei side of this series I need a topic branch anyway, so topic branch it is. I'll prep that so that CI can beat on it over the w/e, and we can rebase the i915/mei series on top, and then send out the topic pull to everyone early next week. You can then all decide whether you need it or not. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
