On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:37:20 -0700 Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> wrote: > On 06/04/2012 02:42 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Setting myself up for a late night crying session once again. Most of the > > people reading this probably know the history and reasons for the patches. If > > not, you can search the intel-gfx mailing list to try to learn more. I won't > > recap the whole thing here, and instead let the patches speak for themselves. > > > > Instead a brief review of what's here, and what's happened. Mostly, > > these badly need testing and review. I've carried these around for so > > long now, and seen so many different failures, I'm quite paranoid they > > still aren't perfect. Also, I've spent almost all of the time working on > > this in the kernel, so there is bound to be simple errors in the other > > stuff. > > > > I've run these on various workloads and saw nothing worth mentioning. > > > > > > 0-16: kernel patches > > > 17-21: libdrm patches (wait render patch is temporary) > > Patches 17-21 look fine. > Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> > > > 22-24: intel-gpu-tools > > 25: mesa > > Patch 25 looks fine too. Feel free to apply some combination of: > Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> > > I do like Paul's comment updates, so I suggest merging those. Ken, would you do these for me on patch 25? It's really your patch anyhow, I just made ever so slight modifications :-) > > > kernel > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel context_support_rev2 > > > > libdrm > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm context_support_rev2 > > > > i-g-t > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/intel-gpu-tools context_support -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
