On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:33:50 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > I have the faint hope that the total absence of any locking for the > rps code wasn't too good an idea and could very well have caused some > rc6 related regressions. > > Unfortunately we've never managed to reproduce these issues on any of > our own machines, so the only way to go about this is to enable it and > see what happens. > > While at it, kill some stale comments and improve the logging. > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Here as with the previous patch, I don't think it belongs in the series.
