Regards
Shashank
On 12/12/2018 2:08 AM, Uma Shankar wrote:
Add bit field and macro for extended tag in CEA block. Also,
declare macros for HDR metadata block.
This should have been a part of patch, where these macros are being
used, so that we can see it being used properly. While re-basing can you
please merge ?
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index b506e36..106fd38 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -2843,6 +2843,22 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
#define EDID_CEA_YCRCB422 (1 << 4)
#define EDID_CEA_VCDB_QS (1 << 6)
+#define DATA_BLOCK_EXTENDED_TAG 0x07
Alignment should be one tab back, also I think we already have added
extended tag macro (for parsing YCBCR420 blocks)
+#define VIDEO_CAPABILITY_DATA_BLOCK 0x0
+#define VSVD_DATA_BLOCK 0x1
Alignment one tab back
+#define COLORIMETRY_DATA_BLOCK 0x5
+#define HDR_STATIC_METADATA_BLOCK 0x6
+
+/* HDR Metadata Block: Bit fields */
+#define SUPPORTED_EOTF_MASK 0x3f
+#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_SDR (0x1 << 0)
+#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_HDR (0x1 << 1)
+#define SMPTE_ST2084 (0x1 << 2)
+#define FUTURE_EOTF (0x1 << 3)
why not properly call it HLG if we are adding a bit for it already ?
+#define RESERVED_EOTF (0x3 << 4)
+
+#define STATIC_METADATA_TYPE1 (0x1 << 0)
+
/*
* Search EDID for CEA extension block.
*/
- Shashank
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
