[PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Remove the defunct flushing list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

I'd like to keep the analysis of why things blow up on the BUG_ON(seqno ==
0) here in the commit message, i.e. the two patches that together caused
the regression (I think we need both the flushing list prep patch an
-ERESTART from intel_ring_begin). Plus the scenario of what exactly needs
to be submitted and interrupted that you've laid out on irc.

Although I have to admit that I still fail to understand how the
unconditional flush can't plug all holes, i.e. if you come up with a
recipe to blow things up with only that broken patch applied, I'd much
appreciate it ;-)

/me feels way to dense about all the complexity we have here

One thing popped out a bit while reading this patch again, comment below.

Thanks, Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c   |    7 ----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h       |   19 +++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c       |   57 ++++++---------------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c |   20 ------------
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 359f6e8..d149890 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
>  
>  enum {
>  	ACTIVE_LIST,
> -	FLUSHING_LIST,
>  	INACTIVE_LIST,
>  	PINNED_LIST,
>  };
> @@ -177,10 +176,6 @@ static int i915_gem_object_list_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  		seq_printf(m, "Inactive:\n");
>  		head = &dev_priv->mm.inactive_list;
>  		break;
> -	case FLUSHING_LIST:
> -		seq_printf(m, "Flushing:\n");
> -		head = &dev_priv->mm.flushing_list;
> -		break;
>  	default:
>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -238,7 +233,6 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void* data)
>  
>  	size = count = mappable_size = mappable_count = 0;
>  	count_objects(&dev_priv->mm.active_list, mm_list);
> -	count_objects(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list, mm_list);
>  	seq_printf(m, "  %u [%u] active objects, %zu [%zu] bytes\n",
>  		   count, mappable_count, size, mappable_size);
>  
> @@ -2006,7 +2000,6 @@ static struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>  	{"i915_gem_gtt", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0},
>  	{"i915_gem_pinned", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, (void *) PINNED_LIST},
>  	{"i915_gem_active", i915_gem_object_list_info, 0, (void *) ACTIVE_LIST},
> -	{"i915_gem_flushing", i915_gem_object_list_info, 0, (void *) FLUSHING_LIST},
>  	{"i915_gem_inactive", i915_gem_object_list_info, 0, (void *) INACTIVE_LIST},
>  	{"i915_gem_pageflip", i915_gem_pageflip_info, 0},
>  	{"i915_gem_request", i915_gem_request_info, 0},
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 51e234e..38b95be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -696,17 +696,6 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
>  		struct list_head active_list;
>  
>  		/**
> -		 * List of objects which are not in the ringbuffer but which
> -		 * still have a write_domain which needs to be flushed before
> -		 * unbinding.
> -		 *
> -		 * last_rendering_seqno is 0 while an object is in this list.
> -		 *
> -		 * A reference is held on the buffer while on this list.
> -		 */
> -		struct list_head flushing_list;
> -
> -		/**
>  		 * LRU list of objects which are not in the ringbuffer and
>  		 * are ready to unbind, but are still in the GTT.
>  		 *
> @@ -873,7 +862,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>  	struct drm_mm_node *gtt_space;
>  	struct list_head gtt_list;
>  
> -	/** This object's place on the active/flushing/inactive lists */
> +	/** This object's place on the active/inactive lists */
>  	struct list_head ring_list;
>  	struct list_head mm_list;
>  	/** This object's place on GPU write list */
> @@ -882,9 +871,9 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>  	struct list_head exec_list;
>  
>  	/**
> -	 * This is set if the object is on the active or flushing lists
> -	 * (has pending rendering), and is not set if it's on inactive (ready
> -	 * to be unbound).
> +	 * This is set if the object is on the active lists (has pending
> +	 * rendering and so a non-zero seqno), and is not set if it i s on
> +	 * inactive (ready to be unbound) list.
>  	 */
>  	unsigned int active:1;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 875b745..f69d897 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1458,26 +1458,6 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -i915_gem_object_move_off_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> -{
> -	list_del_init(&obj->ring_list);
> -	obj->last_rendering_seqno = 0;
> -	obj->last_fenced_seqno = 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -i915_gem_object_move_to_flushing(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> -{
> -	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> -	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -
> -	BUG_ON(!obj->active);
> -	list_move_tail(&obj->mm_list, &dev_priv->mm.flushing_list);
> -
> -	i915_gem_object_move_off_active(obj);
> -}
> -
> -static void
>  i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> @@ -1487,13 +1467,18 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&obj->gpu_write_list));
>  	BUG_ON(!obj->active);
> +
> +	list_del_init(&obj->ring_list);
>  	obj->ring = NULL;
>  
> -	i915_gem_object_move_off_active(obj);
> +	obj->last_rendering_seqno = 0;
> +	obj->last_fenced_seqno = 0;
>  	obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
>  
> -	obj->active = 0;
> +	obj->base.write_domain &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;

Clearing the write_domain here makes me rather uneasy ... I see that we
should plug gpu write domains leaking out of obj->active (at least until
we've ripped out all that gpu domain tracking complexity for good). But I
also fear that this papers over some issues - at least in the old code we
should never be able to see this. Maybe just add a comment to explain
what's going on?

>  	obj->pending_gpu_write = false;
> +
> +	obj->active = 0;
>  	drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
>  
>  	WARN_ON(i915_verify_lists(dev));
> @@ -1728,20 +1713,6 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
>  		i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(dev_priv, ring);
>  
> -	/* Remove anything from the flushing lists. The GPU cache is likely
> -	 * to be lost on reset along with the data, so simply move the
> -	 * lost bo to the inactive list.
> -	 */
> -	while (!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list)) {
> -		obj = list_first_entry(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list,
> -				      struct drm_i915_gem_object,
> -				      mm_list);
> -
> -		obj->base.write_domain = 0;
> -		list_del_init(&obj->gpu_write_list);
> -		i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Move everything out of the GPU domains to ensure we do any
>  	 * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
>  	 */
> @@ -1812,10 +1783,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  		if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_rendering_seqno))
>  			break;
>  
> -		if (obj->base.write_domain != 0)
> -			i915_gem_object_move_to_flushing(obj);
> -		else
> -			i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
> +		i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (unlikely(ring->trace_irq_seqno &&
> @@ -3877,7 +3845,6 @@ i915_gem_entervt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	}
>  
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list));
> -	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list));
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.inactive_list));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  
> @@ -3935,7 +3902,6 @@ i915_gem_load(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.active_list);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.inactive_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.gtt_list);
> @@ -4186,12 +4152,7 @@ static int
>  i915_gpu_is_active(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	int lists_empty;
> -
> -	lists_empty = list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list) &&
> -		      list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list);
> -
> -	return !lists_empty;
> +	return !list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list);
>  }
>  
>  static int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> index ae7c24e..f61af59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> @@ -92,23 +92,6 @@ i915_gem_evict_something(struct drm_device *dev, int min_size,
>  
>  	/* Now merge in the soon-to-be-expired objects... */
>  	list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.active_list, mm_list) {
> -		/* Does the object require an outstanding flush? */
> -		if (obj->base.write_domain)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (mark_free(obj, &unwind_list))
> -			goto found;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Finally add anything with a pending flush (in order of retirement) */
> -	list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.flushing_list, mm_list) {
> -		if (mark_free(obj, &unwind_list))
> -			goto found;
> -	}
> -	list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.active_list, mm_list) {
> -		if (!obj->base.write_domain)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		if (mark_free(obj, &unwind_list))
>  			goto found;
>  	}
> @@ -171,7 +154,6 @@ i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev, bool purgeable_only)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	lists_empty = (list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.inactive_list) &&
> -		       list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list) &&
>  		       list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list));
>  	if (lists_empty)
>  		return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -188,8 +170,6 @@ i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev, bool purgeable_only)
>  
>  	i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
>  
> -	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list));
> -
>  	/* Having flushed everything, unbind() should never raise an error */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next,
>  				 &dev_priv->mm.inactive_list, mm_list) {
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux