On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:16:13 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote: > mostly for convenience, this will help us clear up a bit of the code in > intel_ringbuffer.c I don't think your couple of use-cases is a strong enough argument to justify an extra pointer on thousands of objects. If you wanted, you could make the ilk pc w/a use the status page instead... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
