On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:10:24PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:38:53PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:37:49PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> >> Let the passed in array be const (and thus placed in rodata) instead of > >> >> a mutable array of const pointers. > >> >> > >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> fs/sysfs/file.c | 4 ++-- > >> >> include/linux/sysfs.h | 8 ++++---- > >> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks; who should pick them up? > > > > I could pick the first one up, but as you need this for a drm patch, > > both should probably go through that tree, right? > > I can pick them both if it doesn't bother you that the sysfs parts will > be merged in the merge window for v4.21 i.e. the change would be in drm > trees for an entire release cycle. We've been done for v4.20 merge > window for a while now. No objection from me. greg k-h _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
