On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:42:42PM +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Introduced in commits c1cd90ed and d27b1e0e > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> This one smells like gcc being stupid - it's in a static function an gcc sees all the callsites and we only pass in a const ring argument. I'll drop that one. The other one is a bit more fishy, but we do check args->size == 0 before calling into these functions, so we will execute the loop at least once and hence is guaranteed to be initialized. It's harder to check, so gcc has a point here. But this code is scheduled to get completely rewritten anyway, so I'll drop this one, too. I'll re-send the new code in a few days or so. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
