On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:42:02PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:41:11 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > The locking in our setup and teardown paths is rather arbitrary, but > > generally we try to protect gem stuff with dev->struct_mutex. Further, > > the ums/gem ioctl to setup gem _does_ take the look. So fix up this > > benign inconsistency. > > It is completely arbitrary and only exists to keep lockdep and various > BUG_ON(mutex_lock) happy. From your reading, we would have a lockdep > warning with ums/gem? > > The extra little step towards consistency is likely to save a warning > later, so > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> Queued for -next, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
