On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 07:35, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > With the introduction of the PCH, we gained an LVDS presence pin but we > continued to use the existing logic that asserted that LVDS was only > supported on certain mobile chipsets. However, there are desktop > IronLake systems with LVDS attached which we fail to detect. So for PCH, > trust the LVDS presence pin and quirk all the lying manufacturers. > > Reported-by: Daniel Woff <wolff.daniel at gmail.com> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43171 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> > Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com> I think it is a valid use-case for LVDS connections for the all-in-one and similar machines. They don't necessarily have to be mobile, but they can have a LVDS connection. -- Eugeni Dodonov <http://eugeni.dodonov.net/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120209/4c9a776d/attachment.htm>
