On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:53:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:47:15 -0200 > Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> > > > > I'm not sure why they are needed (I didn't notice any difference in my > > tests), but these bits are in our documentation and they are also set by > > the Windows driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> > > --- > > Do we pretend to support interlaced on SDVO? If so, there's a bit for > that too, but only on IBX, not PPT or CPT. Indeed, we do pretend. Paulo, can you whip together the follow up patch to fix that magical sdvo interlaced bit on ilk? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
